APHC010603352025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31319/2025 Between: 1. N CHINNA BIDAMMA, W/O N. SREENIVASULU REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O GOLLAPALLI, PACHIGUNTA, GANGADHARA NELLORE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOO 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT O/O DISTRICT COLLECTOR AT CHITTOOR 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHITTOOR REVENUE DIVISION CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR 5. THE THASILDHAR, GANGADHARA NELLORE MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High 2 Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.5 in interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property situated in (i) Sy. No. 39/10 of an extent of Ac. 0.20 cents (ii) Sy. No. 39/3A of an extent of Ac. 0.25 cents (iii) Sy. No. 22/11 of an extent of Ac. 0.37 cents and (iv) Sy. No. 22/10 of an extent of Ac. 0.19 cents at Pachigunta Village, Gangadhara Nellore Mandal, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and being violative of articles 14, 21 and 300(A) of the constitution of India and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property situated in (i) Sy. No. 39/10 of extent of Ac. 0.20 cents (ii) Sy. No. 39/3A of an extent of Ac. 0.25 cents (iii) Sy. No. 22/11 of an extent of Ac. 0.37 cents and (iv) Sy. No. 22/10 of an extent of Ac. 0.19 cents at Pachigunta Village, Gangadhara Nellore Mandal, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh and pass such other order or orders in the interest of Justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 5 to not to interfere into thepetitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property situated in (i) Sy. No. 39/10 of an extent of Ac. 0.20 cents; (ii) Sy. No. 39/3A of an extent of Ac. 0.25 cents; (iii) Sy. No. 22/11 of an extent of Ac. 0.37 cents and (iv) Sy. No. 22/10 of an extent of Ac. 0.19 cents at Pachigunta Village, Gangadhara Nellore Mandal, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the action of the Respondent No.5 in interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property situated in (i) Sy. No. 39/10 of an extent of Ac. 0.20 cents (ii) Sy. No. 39/3A of an extent of Ac. 0.25 cents (iii) Sy. No. 22/11 of an extent of Ac. 0.37 cents and (iv) Sy. No. 22/10 of an extent of Ac. 0.19 cents at Pachigunta Village, Gangadhara Nellore Mandal, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and being violative of articles 14, 21 and 300(A) of the constitution of India and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property situated in (i) Sy. No. 39/10 of extent of Ac. 0.20 cents (ii) Sy. No. 39/3A of an extent of Ac. 0.25 cents (iii) Sy. No. 22/11 of an extent of Ac. 0.37 cents and (iv) Sy. No. 22/10 of an extent of Ac. 0.19 cents at Pachigunta Village, Gangadhara Nellore Mandal, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh and pass such other order or orders in the interest of Justice and pass...” 2. Heard Sri P.Jagadish Chandra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents. 3. Without going into the merits of the case, it is submitted that subsequent to grant of patta, on the complaints made by some third parties, the respondents have conducted survey by following the procedure contemplated under the Act by issuing notices to the petitioner and subsequent to the survey, the authorities have also 4 issued appropriate proceedings and as of now, the respondents are not interfering with the possession of the petitioner over the subject property and if at all the respondents intend to evict the petitioner from the subject property, they will follow due process of law. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, by recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents, the Writ Petition may be disposed of. 6. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession of the subject property by the petitioner, without following due process of law. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 20.11.2025 RD 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO.31319 OF 2025 20.11.2025 RD