[2025:RJ-JP:51904] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9639/2025 Vikram Yogi S/o Shri Banwaree Lal Yogi, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Lungi, Post Ungwa, Tehsil Sikrai, Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Integrated Child Development Department, State Of Rajasthan, 2, Janpath Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Director (Nutrition Mission- Poshan Abhiyan), Integrated Child Development Department, State Of Rajasthan, 2, Janpath Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur. 4. Lead Guard Services Private Limited, Through Its Director, Office At 312, Vaishali Tower-1St, Nursery Circle, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302021. 5. Deputy Director, Child Development Project Officer, Dausa, Women And Child Development Department, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 6. Child Development Project Officer, Lalsot, Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Apoorva Agarwal for Mr. Himanshu Jain For Respondent(s) : Ms. Pooja Sharma, AAAG for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 19/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “i. By issuing appropriate writ order or direction, Respondents may be directed to recommend the name of the Petitioner for the purpose of absorption [2025:RJ-JP:51904] (2 of 3) [CW-9639/2025] as contractual employee, pursuant to the directions issued vide order dated 16.05.2025 and consequent thereto, Petitioner may be absorbed as contractual employee on the post of Block Coordinator under the direct control of Official Respondent and he may be allowed to continue on the post till the currency of the project.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 10.11.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.549/2024 titled as Hitendra Kumar Sharma and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Rodu Lal and Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. in DB CWP No.11737/2024. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of Rodu Lal and Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Hitendra Kumar Sharma and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra). 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Rodu Lal and Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. [2025:RJ-JP:51904] (3 of 3) [CW-9639/2025] (supra) and Hitendra Kumar Sharma and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) , but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /181