HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 874 of 2025 (M/S) Jamshed Ali ….......Petitioner Vs. Saleem Ahmad and Others ..... Respondents Present : Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the petitioner. JUDGMENT Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks directions for expeditious disposal of Case No.33/2016-17, Jamshed Ali Vs. Saleem Ahmad and Others, pending in the court of Sub- Divisional Magistrate/Assistant Collector, I Class, Roorkee, District Haridwar. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 3. Cases may not be expedited on mere filing of a petition. Cases are prioritized and listed according to the pendency of cases in a particular court. Simply because some litigant approaches this Court, a case may not be prioritized. This is one aspect of the matter. Another aspect of the matter is that every case needs expeditious disposal. But then, as stated, cases are prioritized based on the age of the cases, position of the parties, etc. 2 4. This Court has no doubt that the court concerned shall make endeavour to decide cases pending in the court as expeditiously as possible, as per priority and pendency of the cases in that court. 5. With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of, accordingly. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 27.03.2025 Ravi Bisht