APHC010658072025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 33950/2025 Between: 1. G VENKATESH, S/O G RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O D.NO.12-460, RAJIV GANDHI COLONY, SATHYANARAYANAPURAM, TIRUPATHI TOWN, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, TIRUPATHI 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUCHANURU POLICE STATION, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUCHANURU POLICE STATION, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 6. P BHASKAR REDDY, S/O P GOPAL REDDY, RTD WING COMMANDER, INDIAN AIR FORCE, R/O D.N0.19-42-S-29, KAKATHIYA NAGAR, OLD TIRUCHANUR ROAD, TIRUPATHI 7. P LEEMA REDDY, W/O P UDAYA BHASKAR, R/O D.N0.19-42-S- 29, KAKATHIYA NAGAR, OLD TIRUCHANUR ROAD, TIRUPATHI. 8. P DEEPIKA REDDY, W/O PAVAN KUMAR REDDY, R/O D.N0.19- 42-S-29, KAKATHIYA NAGAR, OLD TIRUCHANUR ROAD, TIRUPATHI. 9. V RAJYALAKSHMI, W/O V RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, R/O D.NO.10- 71/G, LAVANYA APARTMENTS. ROYAL NAGAR, R.C ROAD, TIRUPATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or orders specially one in the nature of Writ 2 of Mandamus declaring the acts of the Respondents No.4 and 5 herein in calling me to police station and making police station and insisting me to withdraw the O.S No.137 of 2025 on the file of the IV Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tirupathi, and hand over the Plot bearing No.47. formed in an extent of Ac.1.90.cts in S.No.215/2 near Agri-Gold, Mangalam Group No.24, Chennayigunta Village Account, Tirupathi Urban Mandal, Tirupathi District, erstwhile Chittoor District, to the Respondents No.6 to 9 immediately, by interfering in the civil dispute, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 21 of the Constitution of India and misuse of powers vested with the office of Respondents No.4 and 5 herein and consequently desist the Respondents No.4 and 5 herein from calling petitioner to the police station and insisting me to withdraw the O.S No.137 of 2025 and hand over the possession of the land stated supra to the Respondents No.6 to 9 immediately, by also directing them not to interfere in the civil disputes and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V JAGGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue writ, order or orders specially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the acts of the Respondents 4 and 5 herein in calling him to police station and making police station and insisting him to withdraw O.S No.137 of 2025 on the file of the IV Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tirupathi, and hand over the Plot bearing No.47 formed in an extent of Ac.1.90.cts in S.No.215/2 near Agri-Gold, Mangalam Group No.24, Chennayigunta Village Account, Tirupathi Urban Mandal, Tirupathi District, erstwhile Chittoor District, to Respondents 6 to 9 immediately, by interfering in the civil dispute, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and misuse of powers vested with the office of Respondents 4 and 5 and consequently desist the Respondents 4 and 5 from calling petitioner to the police station and insisting him to withdraw O.S.No.137 of 2025 and hand over the possession of the land stated supra to the Respondents 6 to 9 immediately, by also directing them not to interfere in the civil disputes and pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that respondent Police never interfered in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and unofficial respondents and did not insist him to withdraw the civil suit and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 4 In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed to follow due process of law with regard to the subject matter. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 08.12.2025 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 33950 of 2025 08.12.2025 Mjl /*