[2025:RJ-JP:39898] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11101/2025 Vishal S/o Late Ramphool, Aged About 22 Years, Residence Of Meena Ka Mohalla Bilwa, Ps- Shivdaspura, District Jaipur South Rajasthan. (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12493/2025 Vikas S/o Jagdish, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Naya Wali Dhani Vatika P.s Sanganer Sadar Jaipur South Raj. (Accused At Present Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Pareek Mr. Beer Singh Nirban For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Umesh Dixit HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 26/09/2025 1. The present bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS are filed by the applicants-accused Vishal S/o Late Ramphool,Vikas S/o Jagdish, seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No. 586/2025 dated 13.08.2025 registered at P.S. Shivdaspura, Jaipur City (South) for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 333 of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:39898] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11101/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants, have been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against them is complete and they are no more required in investigation. He further submits that there is no chance of applicants-accused flexing from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicants do not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicants undertake not to repeat the offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for applicants-accused submitted that applicants-accused are innocent persons and are in custody since long and trial will take its own time and from tomorrow, there is Navaratra and Vijayadashmi Festival and for celebrating the said Festivals with family members, the applicants may be enlarged on bail. He submits that all injuries are on non-vital parts and not sufficient to draw any conclusion against petitioners. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for complainant has vehemently opposed the bail applications and submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants- accused. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both parties and upon perusal of the material available on record, the Court finds that the grounds raised in support of the bail application, coupled with other facts such as absence [2025:RJ-JP:39898] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11101/2025] of any apprehension regarding absconding of applicants- accused, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses, it is justified to grant bail. 7. Thus, the instant bail applications filed on behalf of applicants-accused Vishal S/o Late Ramphool, Vikas S/o Jagdish, are hereby allowed and the applicants-accused are ordered to be released on bail with condition that each of the applicant would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicants-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicants-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) The accused shall mark their attendance on first Monday of every month at P.S. Shivdaspura. (v) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 8. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J ashu /47-48