Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41978 (AP)

Nallaboina Hanumantha Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/29311/2021 · 2025-10-27

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010486922021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29311/2021 Between: 1. NALLABOINA HANUMANTHA RAO, S/O. POTIRTI RAJU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. GURAWAYAPALEM VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 11-4-4, BOYA COLONY, 13TH WARD, SATTENAPALLI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE, AP DGP HEAD QUARTERS, FIRST FLOOR,MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR URBAN DISTRICT -522503, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT, GUNTUR REGION, GUNTUR. 2 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT,- GUNTUR DISTRICT. MEDICAL COLLEGE BACKSIDE, DISTRICT COURT ROAD, GUNTUR. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 6. MANUKONDA SIVARAMA SESHI REDDY, S/O SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC. REAL ESTATE BUSINESS, R/O DR.NO. 7-3-61, REDDYPALEM VILLAGE, GUNTUR RURAL MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. Y L SIVAKALPANA REDDY(SC CUM SPL PP,CID) The Court made the following Order: [[ This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “ … to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent and his staff in interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioner by calling him regularly to their office at the behest of the 6th respondent herein, . harassing him and pressurising him to pay money to the 6th respondent herein, by withdrawing the insolvency petition that is pending as illegal arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the 4th Respondent and his staff not to unnecessarily call the petitioner to the office / harass the petitioner at the behest of the 6th respondent herein for payment of money while directing the 1 to 3 respondents to initiate action against the 4th respondent herein”. 3 2. Heard Sri D.V.Sasidhar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Police are interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and un-official respondent. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Writ Petition is filed by making allegations against the respondent No.4, who is the Deputy Superintendent of Police, is no more. 5. In view of the submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, no cause of action survives in the Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:28.10.2025 RSD 4 109 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WP.No.29311 of 2021 Dt.28.10.2025 RSD