Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41976 (RAJ)

HARLAL SINGH DUKIYA S/O BHAGVANARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/12939/2025 · 2025-08-28

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:34315] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12939/2025 Harlal Singh Dukiya S/o Bhagvanaram, R/o Chaudhary Charan Singh Nagar, Navalgadh Road, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Ministry Of Local Self Governance, Secretariat, Jaipur Pin - 302001 2. Director Local Bodies, Ministry Of Local Self Governance Pin - 302001 3. Municipal Council Sikar, Through Commissioner, Pin - 332001 4. Chairman Municipal Council, Sikar Pin - 332001 5. Mahendra Singh S/o Ghasiram Ruhela, R/o Ward 57, Behind Bhartiya School, Navalgadh Road, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Mitul Jain JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 28/08/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.5 is raising unauthorised and illegal constructions in contravention of the provisions contained under the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 2009 (for short, “the Act of 2009”) for which a complaint was submitted by the petitioner, upon which a notice was issued to the respondent No.5 by the Municipal Council, Sikar under Section 194/245 of the Act of 2009 on two occasions and the last notice was issued on 24.09.2024, but in spite of passing of more than 11 months, till date, no action has been taken, [2025:RJ-JP:34315] (2 of 2) [CW-12939/2025] hence, under these circumstances, interference of this Court is warranted. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record. 3. In the considered opinion of this Court, the job of the petitioner is over, but again and again the complaint has been filed by the petitioner and a notice has already been issued to the respondent No.5 by the Municipal Council, Sikar, now, it is for the Municipal Council to look into the matter and proceed further against the respondent No.5. 4. It is expected from the Municipal Council, Sikar to expedite the matter strictly in accordance with law and pass appropriate and reasoned orders on the notice issued to the respondent No.5. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stand disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /6