IN TH 210 K.K. Rao @ Dr. Shal Warehous CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate B State Ware India and o dated 30.3. System An Warehousin Learned co has alread COCP-5112-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.5112 o Date of decision . Rao @ Krishan Kumar Rao Versus Shaleen, The Managing Dir ehousing Corporation, Panchkula AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the petitioner. Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advoca HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 14.5.2025 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP-27 Warehousing Corporation Field Emp and others”. Learned counsel for the respo 30.3.2026 by way of affidavit of S m Analyst, Link Officer of Manager housing Corporation, Panchkula. Th ned counsel for the respondent submits already been made while passing 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 5112 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-30.03.2026 …..Petitioner Director, Haryana State …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA dvocate for the respondent. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 2775-2013 titled as “Punjab d Employees Union vs. Union of e respondent has filed the Reply of Shri Manoj Parashar, Senior nager (Personnel), Haryana State la. The same is taken on record. ubmits that necessary compliance ssing a Speaking Order dated VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.02 18.16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 10.3.2026 petition. had sough initially ap rejoin the p made by l required to disposed o March 30 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-5112-2025 (O & M) .2026 (Annexure R-1); thus, no cau It is noticed that learned coun sought to join the proceedings thr lly appeared but subsequently chose n the proceedings. In view of the above noted by learned counsel for the respond ired to be passed in the present the p osed of. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, 30, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 o cause survives in the present d counsel for the petitioner, who gs through video conferencing, chose to disconnect and did not noted facts and the submissions espondent, no further orders are t the present contempt petition is if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.02 18.16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document