2025:CGHC:44571 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10259 of 2025 Ranajit Kumar Prajapati S/o Shri Chhangu Ram Prajapati, Aged About 51 Years Occupation - Teacher (L.B.) Posted At Government Middle School Mohaba Bazar Kota Block Dharsinwa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Director, Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The District Education Officer, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 5 - The Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 6 - The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Dharsinwa Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 7 - The Block Education Officer, Block Dharsinwa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Sandeep K Sharma, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri Mayur Khandelwal PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 02.09.2025 1. The claim of the petitioner in this petition is with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman/ Time Pay Scale. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that with regard to award of the Time Pay Scale, some Circular has been issued by the respondent/State. Apart from Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.09.04 11:10:02 +0530 Wps 10259 of 2025 2 this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt Sona Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh and others in WA-261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue. Petitioner is also entitled for the Kramonnati Vetanman / Time Pay Scale. He further submits that at present this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in WA-261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner, this petition, at this stage, is disposed of permitting the petitioner to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to the respondents concerned/ competent authority, annexing all relevant documents, and judgment of this Court passed in WA-261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents concerned/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law, considering the Circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in WA-261 of 2023 within further period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, and it is for respondents concerned to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 6. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma