APHC010337072025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO I.A.No.1 of 2025 IN/AND CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2026/2025 Between: 1. TATA VENKATESWARAMMA,, .W/O.LATE ANJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.3-42 (OLD), 1-369 (NEW), TATAVARIPALEM, RAJAVOLU PANCHAYAT, CHERUKUPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT (PRESENTLY BAPATLA DISTRICT) 2. TATA SIVAIAH @ SIVA SANKARA RAO,, S/O.LATE ANJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.3-42 (OLD), 1-369 (NEW), TATAVARIPALEM, RAJAVOLU PANCHAYAT, CHERUKUPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT (PRESENTLY BAPATLA DISTRICT) 3. TATA RAMA KRISHNA,, S/O.LATE ANJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.3-42 (OLD), 1-369 (NEW), TATAVARIPALEM, RAJAVOLU PANCHAYAT, CHERUKUPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT (PRESENTLY BAPATLA DISTRICT). ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. DEVARAJUGATTU SIVANNARAYANA, S/O. RAMA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/O. KORISEPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 2. DEVARAJUGATTU VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. RAMA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. MARTURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT . 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toPetitioners beg to present this Civil revision petition to this honourable court against the order made in EA No. 42 of 2024 in EP.No. 21 of 2019 in OS.No. 123/2013 on the file of the Court of the Civil judge (senior Division), repalle, dated 09-05-2025 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone delay of 331 days in filing the above CRP and grant Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V V L N SARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM 3 The Court made the following Order: Smt. G. Padmavathi Srinivas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks further time. 2. This matter was posted today under the caption “for dismissal”. Hence, further time being granted does not arise. 3. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO Date: 26.12.2025 PGT