Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4196 (ORI)

BIDYARANI DAS v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/33522/2025 · 2026-01-29

Sashikanta Mishra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 | P a g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). No. 33522 of 2025 Bidyarani Das `…. Petitioner Represented by Mr. P.Das, Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha & Ors …. Opposite Parties Represented by CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER_ 29.01.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer: It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the Writ Petition and issue RULE NISI, calling upon the opposite parties, to show cause as to why the order dated 19.08.2025 passed by the Opposite Party No.3, the Sub- Registrar, Bhubaneswar, in refusing to accept the sale deed bearing ID No. 108257890, which was presented by the petitioner on 12.08.2025 for registration shall not be quashed and the opposite Party No.3 the Sub-Registrar, Bhubaneswar shall not be directed to register sale deed forthwith and on their failure to show cause or showing insufficient cause to make the said RULE absolute, may be pleased to quash the order under Annexure-9 to the Writ Petition, thereby refusing to register the sale deed bearing ID No. 108257890, which was presented by the petitioner on 12.08.2025 and may further be pleased to direct the opposite party No.3 the Sub-Registrar, Bhubaneswar to register the sale deed bearing ID No. 108257890 forthwith and/or may be pleased to pass such other or further order as it may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. And for this act of kindness, as in duty bound, the petitioner shall ever pray. 3. Since the remedy of appeal is available under the statute in the Order No. 01. 2 | P a g e form of Section 72 against such order, the writ application is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to prefer appeal within two weeks from today before the appellate authority. If such appeal is preferred along with application seeking condonation delay, the appellate authority shall consider the same liberally having regard to the fact that the petitioner, rightly or wrongly had approached this Court in the present writ application. Further, the appellate authority shall make all endeavour to dispose of the appeal as early as possible, preferably within two months having regard to the fact that the petitioner is a old lady aged about 74 years. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge Deepak