HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12272/2025 Jagdish Son Of Bhorya, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Jalokhara, Police Station, Sadar Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur (Presently Confined In Jail At Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Dinesh Kumar Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr.Amit Kumar Gupta, Dy.GA-cum-PP Mr.Rajneesh Gupta JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “BNSS”) has been filed by the accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.685/2011 registered at Police Station Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur, wherein he is charged for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 469 & 471 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged offence is triable by the Magistrate and as per the allegations in the F.I.R., the petitioner sold the subject land to the wife of the complainant by way of a registered sale deed and possession of the same was handed over to her. Counsel submits that it is the admitted case of the complainant that he and his wife are in the possession of the subject land, but a suit for specific (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12272/2025] performance was submitted by one Dhanphool against the petitioner and the wife of the complainant before the competent Civil Court where an affidavit was submitted by the petitioner. Counsel submits that treating the aforesaid affidavit of the petitioner as incorrect, the instant FIR has been registered against the petitioner. 3. Counsel submits that subsequently, the said suit filed by the said Dhanphool was rejected by the Civil Court, the petitioner is in custody since 02.08.2025 and since the trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. 4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant opposed the prayer. 5. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record. 6. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the alleged offence is triable by the Magistrate and the petitioner is in custody since 02.08.2025 and the trial will take its own time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioners under Section 483 BNSS. 7. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Jagdish S/o Bhorya arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12272/2025] the satisfaction of learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /520