ADITYA SINGH AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/7256/2025 · 2025-04-15
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal, Vivek Kumar Birla
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41956 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41956 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:55472-DB Court No. - 43 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7256 of 2025 Petitioner :- Aditya Singh And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harendra Yadav,Prabhat Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Praveen Kumar Giri,J.
1. Heard Sri Harendra Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Jai Narayan, learned A.G.A.-I for State-respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 08.12.2024 registered as Case Crime No.0559 of 2024, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 420 I.P.C. and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Dhoomanganj, District Prayagraj. Further prayer has been made not to arrest the petitioners in the aforesaid case.
3. Although prayer for quashing of FIR has been made but without insisting on the same only submission is that all alleged offences are punishable with imprisonment upto seven years, therefore the police authorities are bound to follow the procedure laid down under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been wrongly implicated and could not be arrested. Reliance has been placed on the judgement of Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar Vs. Union of India, Ministry of Law and Justice and others in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 73 of 2015 with Criminal Appeal No. 1265 of 2017, Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 156 of 2017, Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
and Another, (2022) 10 SCC 51 and co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court in Vimal Kumar & 3 others Vs. State of U.P. & 3 others in 2021 (2) ACR 1147.
4. We have gone through the impugned first information report and without interfering in the same, we are of the opinion that the guidelines framed by the Apex Court in the above noted judgement are equally applicable to the facts of the instant case.
5. Accordingly, the instant petition also stands disposed of in terms of the judgments noted above. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Radhika Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad