Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41954 (MAD)

RAJA v. B. BARATH

CMP/8231/2025 · 2025-04-28

S Sounthar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP No.8231 of 2025 in CMA SR No.47618 of 2025 S.SOUNTHAR, J. Notice to the first respondent already dispensed with. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the 2nd respondent. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition, the delay of 736 days in filing the appeal is condoned. It is made clear that petitioner is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 736 days on the enhanced award amount, in case of his success in the appeal. Registry is directed to number the civil miscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in order. Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.D.Venkatachalam, counsel for the 2nd respondent at the time of admission. 28.04.2025 mst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis