[2025:RJ-JP:42789] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14868/2025 Pankhee Lal Meena S/o Ramkesh Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 64/327, Rashmi Public, School Pratap Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. IDFC first bank, through branch manager, 271, mahaveer Nagar-II jaipur (raj.) 2. Station House Officer, Sangareddy Zahirabad Town, Sangareddy, Telangana ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anirudh Bhati, Adv with Mr. Harendrapal Singh Ranawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 17/10/2025 1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:- “Therefore, it is most respectfully submitted before this Hon'ble Court that (i) Issue appropriate writ, order or direction to respondents to defreeze the Bank Account No.10208738095 of IDFC First Bank, (IFSC Code-IDFB0042124) Jaipur Branch, Ground Floor and First Floor at 271, Mahaveer Nagar-II, Jaipur Rajasthan forthwith after putting the disputed amount of Rs.20,000/- on hold (i) Any other order which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” [2025:RJ-JP:42789] (2 of 2) [CW-14868/2025] 2. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the IDFC First Bank (Respondent No.1) to keep the disputed amount (the amount which was transferred illegally in the bank account of the petitioner) frozen and allow the petitioner to make transactions from his bank account from the remaining balance. 3. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent – Bank has not received the information regarding the exact figure of the disputed amount, which the Investigating Officer/Police alleges to be receipt(s) of the offence, the bank shall send a communication to the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, to indicate the amount to be earmarked for lien, while endorsing a copy of the instant order. 4. Upon receipt of such communication/letter, the concerned Investigating Officer/Police shall be under an obligation to apprise the respondent - Bank about the amount to be kept in lien, within a period of seven days of receiving the communication from the respondent - Bank. The respondent – bank shall thereafter do the needful as directed herein above. 5. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent-Bank does not receive any reply from the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, then it shall be duty bound to act in accordance with the instant order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J AVINASH GULERIA /24