Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50464 CRL.RP No. 702 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 702 OF 2019 BETWEEN:
SRI NIKHIL HEGDE, S/O B S HEGDE, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO.2-1, YADTHADI VILLAGE AND POST, UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 201. …PETITIONER [BY SRI JAYA PRAKASH K N., ADVOCATE (AB)] AND:
H. VARADARAJ SHETTY, S/O LATE RAGURAM SHETTY, AGEDA BOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.74, 7TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN DEVANATHACHAR STREET, CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU - 560 018. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI JEEVAN K., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT DATED 03.05.2019, PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE LIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH-60) IN CRL.A.NO.379/2017, CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.01.2017 PASSED IN C.C.NO.24481/2015 BY THE COURT OF THE XII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BANGALORE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50464 CRL.RP No. 702 of 2019
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for respondent is present.
2. It is seen that on previous occasions also none appears for petitioner. Noting same, as a final opportunity, matter was adjourned to this day. Even today, there was no representation on behalf of petitioner. This would indicate that petitioner is not pursuing revision petition diligently.
3. Revision petition is dismissed for non-persecution.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23