Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41941 (AP)

Dr.Malempati Priyanka Chowdary v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/9522/2025 · 2025-11-19

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010188522025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 9522/2025 Between: 1. DR.MALEMPATI PRIYANKA CHOWDARY, D/O MADHUSUDHANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, P.G.MEDICAL STUDENT, RESIDING AT D.N 0.13-9-55/2, VISHNAVI TOWERS, POLIMERA ROAD, CHIRALA, BAPATIA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MEDICAL, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DR N T R UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, DR. N.T.R.UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION, , REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, POCKET NO.14, SECTOR-B, DWARAKA, PHASE-1, NEW DELHI, 5. THE PRINCIPAL, N.R.I., INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, SANGIVALASA, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein in not re-conducting the practical and Orals examinations in Post Graduate Medical General 2 Surgery subject of the petitioners final year wherein the petitioner herein passed the theory examinations as internals of the 5th respondent college did not follow the Regulation 8.5(b) of National Medical Commission Post Graduate Medical Regulations, 2023 and failed the practical’s and oral of General Surgery subject is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principals of natural justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S.V.S.S.SIVA RAM 2. GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW 3. Tata Venkata Sridevi,Standing Counsel For Dr.NTR University of Health Sciences The Court made the following: 3 Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayer; “….to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein in not re-conducting the practical and orals examinations in Post Graduate Medical General Surgery subject of the petitioner’s final year wherein the petitioner herein passed the theory examinations as internals of the 5th respondent college did not follow the Regulation 8.5(b) of National Medical Commission Post Graduate Medical Regulations, 2023 and failed the practicals and oral of General Surgery subject is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principals of natural justice and pass such other order or orders as this court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 2. Sri N. Ramesh, learned counsel representing Sri Ch. Vidya Sagar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _______________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date: 20.11.2025 ARB 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.9522 of 2025 Date:20.11.2025 ARB