Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41936 (RAJ)

SUDHIR KUMAR SON OF SHRI OM PRAKASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/12938/2025 · 2025-08-28

Anand Sharma

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:34446] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12938/2025 Sudhir Kumar Son Of Shri Om Prakash, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 6, Village And Post Goluwala, Newadan, 18 Mode, Dhani, Hansaliya Rord, Tehsil Pilibanga, District Hanumangarh, At Present Posted As Teacher Grade-Iii, Level-Ii, At Government Upper Primary School Maliyar Gurjar, Block Tijara, District Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Dy. Secretary Administration, Gramin Vikas And Panchaytiraj Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj). 2. Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj). 3. Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner. 4. District Education Officer, Alwar, District Alwar (Raj). 5. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Alwar (Raj) 6. Chief Block Education Officer, Tijara, Alwar (Raj). 7. Pramod Kumar Son Of Shri Dilip Kumar, Through District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Ganganagar (Raj). Rank No. 462 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat for Ms. Komal Kumari Giri For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 28/08/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while giving appointment to the petitioner pursuant to advertisement issued in the year 2022 for recruitment of Upper Primary School [2025:RJ-JP:34446] (2 of 2) [CW-12938/2025] Teacher vide order dated 15.09.2023, the petitioner is resident of Hanumangarh, yet ignoring the vacancies already existing and available in District Sri Ganganagar, which was his second preference, the petitioner has been posted at Alwar, as preferred by him at No.12. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the light of above, petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the concerned authorities for modification in his place of posting. 3. In view of above, writ petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation with regard to his grievance to the competent authority, who shall decide the same in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of submission of representation along with certified copy of this order. It is made clear that no view has been expressed by this Court on merits of the case. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU /29