904-wp 12027-24.doc Prajakta Vartak IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12027 OF 2024 Mr. Mohit Shantilal Katariya ...Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents __________ Mr. Vishwanath Talkute for the Petitioner. Ms. Tejas Kapre, AGP for State/Respondent No.1. Mr. Rahul Sinha with Mr. Soham Bhalerao i/b. DSK Legal for Respondent No.2/MSEDCL. __________ CORAM : G. S. KULKARNI & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ. DATE : 22 APRIL 2025. P.C.: 1. Called out for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 07 April, 2025. 2. The lines in paragraph 3 of the order i.e. “Mr. Talkure, learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly stated that the demand as raised for electricity charges by respondent No.2 has already been satisfied by the petitioner in as much as, the amounts are paid. He has drawn our attention that also in regard to the charges, the petitioner has invoked the provisions of Section 127(1) read with Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003 by moving an appeal before the Competent Authority.” be deleted and the same be substituted as under:- 22 April 2025 PRAJAKTA SAGAR VARTAK Digitally signed by PRAJAKTA SAGAR VARTAK Date: 2025.04.23 16:13:38 +0530 904-wp 12027-24.doc “Mr. Talkure, learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly stated that an amount of Rs.10 Lakhs has already been deposited by the petitioner. He has drawn our attention that also in regard to the demand of electricity charges, the petitioner has invoked the provisions of Section 127(1) read with Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003 by moving an appeal before the Competent Authority.” 3. The order be corrected accordingly and made available to the parties. [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [G. S. KULKARNI, J.] 22 April 2025