Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41932 (AP)

T N SAI LEELA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/31423/2025 · 2025-11-13

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010596962025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31423/2025 Between: 1. T N SAI LEELA, W/O LATE TN SURYA NARAYANA REDDY. AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/O KAMAPALLI VILLAGE, MADANAPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 2. A NAVITHA, D/O LATE TN SURYA NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 W/O SANTHOS REDDY, R/O D NO. 1-37, LAI TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAYACHOTI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 4. THE TAHSILDAR, LAKKIREDDYPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS challenging the action of the directing 2 Respondent No.3 (RDO, Rayachoti) to forthwith conclude the enquiry initiated pursuant to the Tahsildars proposal dated 30.01.2024 (Ref. B/45/2024) and implement the recommendations therein, including deletion of the subject land (Sy. No. 705/2, Ac. 2.00 cents, Lakkireddipalli Village and Mandal) from notional Khata No. 20001901 and the list of prohibited properties under Section 22-A(l)(a) of the Registration Act, 1908, and its inclusion in the freehold rights list for assigned lands allotted prior to 2003, and the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 (as amended) and Violation of Articles 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution of India consequently direct the Respondent no. 3 conclude the enquiry pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the Respondent no. 3 conclude the enquiry and remove from the from notional Khata No. 20001901 conclude and inclusion in the freehold rights list for assigned lands allotted prior to 2003 pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KODE RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31423 of 2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following relief:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, particularly the 3rd respondent in not considering the report sent by Tahsildar, Lakkireddypalli Mandal on 30.01.2024 as illegal and arbitrary”. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that despite sending the report to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Rayachoti by the Tahsildar, Lakkireddypalli Mandal on 30.01.2024, the 3rd respondent has not considered the said report of deletion of the subject lands from notional Khatha and include in the list of freehold rights as the lands are assigned prior to 2003. 4. Replying to the said contentions, the learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that as per Act 35 of 2023 (A.P.Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act 1977), the 3rd respondent cannot consider the report and cannot pass any orders. 4 5. Considering the said submissions, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue other remedies. 6. Permission is accorded. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt:14.11.2025 sj 5 115 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31423 of 2025 14.11.2025 ssjj