1 2025:CGHC:47463 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10454 of 2025 1 - Smt. Geeta Sahu W/o Harnarayan Sahu, Aged About 68 Years A Retired Work Charged Employee, R/o Ward No. 1, Gandhi Chowk, Bhardakala, Balod Post Balod, Tehsil Balod, District Balod (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Magatin (Legal Heirs), W/o Late Manohar Verma, Aged About 64 Years Widow Of Work Charged Employee, R/o Ward No. 29, Hospital Colony Durg, Post Durg, Tehsil Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 3 - Smt. Chameli Sahu (Legal Heir) W/o Late Ravikant Sahu, Aged About 64 Years A Widow Of The Work Charged Employee, R/o Shaheed Dharmendra Sao Ward 9, Linepara Nagri, Post Nagri, Tehsil Nagri, District Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Finance, Accounts And Treasury, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 5 - The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department No. 01 Durg Dist. Durg (C.G.) 6 - The Executive Engineer, National Highways Division No. 01 Raipur, Public Works Department, Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 7 - The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department No. 03 Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.09.18 10:50:30 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Anand Kumar Kujur, Advocate For State : Ms. Smita Jha, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 16.09.2025 1. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022)]. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika