[2025:RJ-JP:51851] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19979/2025 Hitesh Gupta Son Of Dinesh Gupta, Aged About 30 Years, Address B-45, Malviya Nagar, Alwar (Rajasthan) - 301001. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary To Government And Commissioner, Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) - 302005. 2. Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur (Rajasthan) - 302018. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tribhuvan Narayan Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prateek Saxena, AAAG for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 19/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “(i) by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the Respondent No: 01 (Secretary to Government and Commissioner, Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan) be directed to decide representation dated: 20-11-2025 (Annexure:09) through a reasoned and speaking order after giving petitioner an opportunity of personnel hearing. (ii) in case if the Hon’ble Court did not accept prayer no: (i) of the petitioner then in that case, by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the petitioner be given liberty to file [2025:RJ-JP:51851] (2 of 3) [CW-19979/2025] fresh representation mentioning grievance before the Respondent No.01 (Secretary to Government and Commissioner, Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan) and the Respondent No: 01 (Secretary to Government and Commissioner, Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan) be directed to decide that fresh representation through a reasoned and speaking order after giving petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing. (iii) by an appropriate writ, order or direction the Respondent No:01 (Secretary to Government and Commissioner, Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan) be directed to issue appropriate order in within a period of one month. (iv) any other relief which the Hon’ble Court deems fit be passed in favour of the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner aggrieved of the same, prefers the present Writ Petition. Hence, this Writ Petition.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Mr. Prateek Saxena, AAAG for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG as counsel for the respondents. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to [2025:RJ-JP:51851] (3 of 3) [CW-19979/2025] consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/29