APHC010370812024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18885/2024 Between: PEDDI SAMBASIVA RAO, S/O RADHA KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC- PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. DOOR NO. 135- 8-348, FLAT NO.4, SRI SESHASAI RESIDENCY, VIDYA NAGAR, 3/10 EXTENSION, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PATTABHIPURAM POLICE STATION, PATTABHIPURAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. MANDLEM SANKARA RAO, S/O MANDLEM PULLA RAO, R/O. DOOR NO. 13-1-133, MACHERLA RAILWAY STATION ROAD, 13TH WARD, MACHERLA TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. PHONE 93932 32858, 98490 37943 5. MATLE MURALIKRISHNA, S/O MALAKONDAIAH, R/O. 11-14-28/2, RAMATAKIES LINE, MACHERLA TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. PHONE 70752 74888 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SANAGA ASHOK KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent police in involving in civil matters and threatened the petitioner to sell the petitioner daughters property to the 4th and 5th respondents for meagre price is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent police not to interfere in civil matters and not to harassed the petitioner to sell the petitioner daughters property plot No.11, an extent of 402 sq. yards out of an extent of Ac.2-48 cents in survey No. 11/B in Koritepadu, Guntur Municipal Corporation Area, Guntur, Guntur District.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Sanaga Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, no further orders are required in this matter as the relief has become infructuous. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, leaned Assistant Public Prosecutor for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:29.12.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18885 of 2024 Dt.29.12.2025 Dinesh