IN TH 205 Deepak Gu Suganya K CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation of a co-ordina Sundram G another”, w stay was al petitioner ordered by within a pe to its rights petition, th the respo COCP-2318-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.2318 o Date of decision ak Gupta Versus nya KV AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the petitioner. Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of interim order dated 06.11.2023 ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP ram General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. I , whereby while issuing notice o was also issued and it was directed tha ner-Insurance Company shall dep d by the Insurance Ombudsman a period of four weeks as undertake ights. Further, subject to the final o n, the abovesaid deposited amount m respondent No.2-insured on h 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 2318 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-27.03.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA ocate for the respondent. ition has been filed alleging 1.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by CWP-24933-2023 titled as “royal . vs. Insurance Ombudsman and tice of motion, notice regarding ted that “…In the meanwhile, the deposit the entire amount as an with the Executing Court rtaken today, without prejudice nal outcome of the present writ nt may be released in favour of his furnishing adequate VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.01 17.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document surety/inde petitioner submits tha the amoun No.235567 name of p Chandigarh and the a petitioner. 10.11.2025 none appea made by le required to the present March 27 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-2318-2025 (O & M) /indemnity/security to protect and sa ner-Insurance Company.” At the very outset, learned c its that in compliance of the Writ Co amount has been deposited, where 35567 dated 17.09.2025 amounting of petitioner Deepak Gupta, drawn digarh Main Branch has been issued the amount of Rs.16,10,000/- stan ioner. Order sheet shows that on th 1.2025 none had appeared on behalf appears on behalf of petitioner. In view of the above noted by learned counsel for the respond ired to be issued in the present contem resent contempt petition is disposed o Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, 7, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 nd safeguard the interest of the rned counsel for the respondent rit Court order dated 06.11.2023, whereafter the Demand Draft unting to Rs.16,10,000/- in the drawn at State Bank of India, issued in the name of petitioner stands released in favour of t on the last date of hearing i.e. ehalf of petitioner. Even today noted facts and the submissions spondent, no further direction is contempt petition. Accordingly, sed of. if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.01 17.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document