P a g e 1 | 1 Item No. 44 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(WA) No. 1 of 2025 Manipur University & Anr. … Applicant - Versus - Kshetrimayum Tejkeshware Singh & 3 Ors. … Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. D. KRISHNAKUMAR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE GOLMEI GAIPHULSHILLU 24.02.2025 [D. Krishnakumar, CJ] Mr. BP Sahu, learned senior counsel appears through VC for the applicant, Mr. Nongdamba, learned counsel appears on behalf of Mr. Kaminikumar, learned conducting counsel for the respondent No. 2, Ms. N. Savitri, learned counsel appears for the respondent No. 1 and Ms. Sumitra, learned counsel appears for the respondents No. 3 & 4. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection to the application filed for condoning the delay of 106 days for filing accompanying writ appeal. We have gone through the averments and satisfied with the reasons for filing the present application for condoning the delay in filing the accompanying writ appeal. In view of the above, the present application is allowed and disposed of. Registry is directed to number the writ appeal and list the matter at the earliest. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Bipin KHOIROM BIPINCHANDR A SINGH Digitally signed by KHOIROM BIPINCHANDRA SINGH Date: 2025.02.25 12:23:15 +05'30'