Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39549 WP No. 14298 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 14298 OF 2020 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1. NANDARAJU S/O LATE VENKATARAJU AGED ABOUT 72 YEAWRS R/AT 327-A, 5TH MAIN ROAD B.C.C LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGARA BENGALURU - 560 040.
2. SATHYABHAMA W/O NANDARAJU AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT NO. 3247-A, 5TH MAIN ROAD, B.C.C. LAYOUT VIJAYANAGARA BENGALURU 560 040.
3. DUSHYANTH S/O NANDARAJU AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/AT NO. 3247-A, 5TH MAIN ROAD, B.C.C. LAYOUT VIJAYANAGARA BENGALURU 560 040.
4.
RAGHAVENDRA RAJU S/O LATE VENKATARAJU AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO.01, 10TH CROSS YELLAPPA GARDEN MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU 560 003. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI S.V. PRAKASH, ADV.)
Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39549 WP No. 14298 of 2020
AND:
1.
V. MUNIRAJU S/O LATE VENKATARAJU AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT NO. 92, 4TH CROSS B.C.C. LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU 560 040.
2. BHAGYAMMA W/O LATE NARASHIMARAJU AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS R/AT SHAMMANNABHAVI ROAD, SHIDLAGHATTA TLAUK 562105 SHIDDALAGHATTA CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V.K. RAMESHA, ADV., FOR R-1;
SRI RAGHAVENDRA G.K, ADV., FOR R-2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 19.11.2020 PASSED BY THE COURT OF LEARNED XLII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGLAURU CITY (CCH.NO.43) BENGALURU ON I.A.NO.XIII IN O.S.NO.3290/2011 PRODUCED AS PER ANNEXURE-G TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to urge the grounds raised in this petition in the appeal
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39549 WP No. 14298 of 2020
in the event the judgment in O.S.No.3290/2011 is passed adverse to the interest of the petitioners.
2. The said memo and submission is placed on record.
3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE NMS