Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41895 (BOM)

VIDHYA VITTHALRAO MORE AND ORS v. SUNITA VITTHAL ALIAS VITTHALRAO MORE AND ANR

WP/19356/2024 · 2025-03-10

Shri N J Jamadar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

13-WP-19356-2024.DOC Arun Sankpal IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 19356 OF 2024 Vidhya Vitthalrao More & Ors ..Petitioners Versus Sunita Vitthal Alias Vitthalrao More & Anr …Respondents Mr. Laxman S. Deshmukh, for the Petitioners. CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED : 10th MARCH 2025 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2. The petition assails an order of 10th July 2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Barshi, whereby witness summons has been ordered to be issued to the bank in which the deceased had allegedly maintained a deposit. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the witness summons was not required to be issued as the said witness was not named in the list of witnesses. The Trial Court has issued the witness summons on the premise that, it is necessary to ascertain the amount laying to the credit of the account of the deceased. 1/2 ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Digitally signed by ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Date: 2025.03.11 18:41:06 +0530 13-WP-19356-2024.DOC 4. Such an order does not warrant interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. 5. Petition disposed. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2