BHARAT TUKARAM PATIL AND ANR v. DIGHANCHI VIKAS SEVA SOC. LTD AND ORS
WP/4167/2025 · 2025-04-21
Shri N J Jamadar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41891 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41891 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
7-cra-228-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4167 OF 2025 Bharat Tukaram Patil and Anr. … Petitioner V/s. Dighanchi Vikas Seva Soc. Ltd and Ors. … Respondent ------------------- Mr. Nagesh Chavan, for the petitioner. Mr. Sachin Hande, for the respondents. Ms. Savina Crasto, AGP, for the Respondent/State. --------------------
CORAM :
N.J. JAMADAR, J. DATE :
21ST APRIL 2025. PC:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an application for amendment of the plaint, and in the event, such an application is allowed, file a fresh application for temporary injunction.
3. Leave granted with liberty as prayed for.
4. The petitioner is permitted to file an application for amendment in the plaint, and, in the event, such an application for amendment in the plaint is allowed, the petitioner may file a fresh application for the grant of temporary relief. varsha 1 of 2 VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Digitally signed by VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Date: 2025.04.22 15:59:50 +0530
7-cra-228-2025.doc
5. In the event such applications are filed, those applications be decided on their own merits and in accordance with law without being influenced by the orders passed by the Trial Court as well as the Appellate Court as expeditiously as possible.
6. All the contentions of all the parties are kept open.
7. It is, hereby, clarified that this Court has not entertained the merits of the matter.
(N.J. JAMADAR, J) varsha 2 of 2