BHARTIYA BANK KARMCHARI (SALARY EARNERS) v. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
WRIC/27138/2020 · 2025-10-05
Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41888 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41888 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 27138 of 2020 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. Sri Sujeet Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the parties have settled the dispute amicably outside the Court and no cause of action survives in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 6, 2025 SS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sujeet Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : Akshara Rai, Gyan Prakash Shrivastava (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Bhartiya Bank Karmchari (Salary Earners) .....Petitioner(s) Central Bank Of India And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad