IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 215 CRM-M-18119-2025 Date of Decision:22.05.2025 JAGROOP KUMAR @ JAGROOP SINGH @ JAGGA …PETITIONER VS. STATE OF PUNJAB …RESPONDENT Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Umesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, Deputy, A.G., Punjab. Mr. Aman Pratap Singh, Advocate for Mr. Joginder Pal Ratra, Advocate for the complainant. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.45, dated 11.03.2025, under Sections 125 (336 of IPC), 191(3) (148 of IPC), 190 (149 IPC) of BNS & Section 25 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Chheharta, District Amritsar. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been amicably resolved between the parties and the parties have signed a settlement agreement dated 24.04.2025 in this regard. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent has not disputed the said fact. VIPIN KUMAR 2025.05.23 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order CRM-M-18119-2025 2 4. Learned counsel for the parties have jointly stated that they shall remain bound by the terms of the compromise and they have compromised the matter for the purpose of the disposal of the present bail application. 5. Heard. 6. Thus, without commenting any further, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is granted concession of anticipatory bail, subject to the conditions as provided under Sections 482 (2) of B.N.S.S. It will be open for the Investigating Officer to call the petitioner to join the investigation, if so required, by issuing a written notice in this regard and they shall abide by the conditions mentioned in Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S. 22.05.2025 (N.S. SHEKHAWAT) vipin JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIPIN KUMAR 2025.05.23 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order