APHC010511812011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 762/2011 Between: 1. K.RADHAKRISHNAIAH, S/O.RAMALINGAIAH AUDITOR R/O.5/949, POTTI SREE RAMULU ROAD, STONE HOUSEPETA, NELLORE- 524 002. ...APPELLANT AND 1. ASST COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT ANR, NELLORE 2. SRI AYYALURI VENKATA PANTHULU COULTRY, NELLORE REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 544 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 12 days in the preferring appeal IA NO: 2 OF 2011(CMAMP 584 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the order and decree in OA.No. 1174 of 2010 (OA.no. 1 of 1997 of DC, Guntur) dt. 13/10/2010 passed by 2 JS,J C.M.A.No.762/2011 A.P.Endowments Tribunal at Hyderabad during the pendency of the above appeal in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CMAMP 1068 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated: 26-7-2011 passed in CMAMP NO. 584 of 2011 in CMA NO. 762 of 2011 and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. B NARASIMHA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ARBITRATION (AP) 2. V T M PRASAD 3. DEVI SUBHASHINI ANNE SC For Endowments 3 JS,J C.M.A.No.762/2011 The Court made the following JUDGMENT: Though the matter was adjourned on 03.07.2025, 17.07.2025, 01.08.2025, and 27.11.2025, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter is directed to be listed on 04.12.2025 under the caption “for dismissal”. Even on that day there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Therefore, the matter is listed today under the same caption. Today when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant. It appears that the learned counsel for the appellant is not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order granted earlier shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 26.12.2025 KAS 4 JS,J C.M.A.No.762/2011 161 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 762/2011 Dated: 26.12.2025 KAS