Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41881 (RAJ)

SMT NIRMALA MEENA WIFE OF SHRI R.K. MEENA v. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

CW/12049/2025 · 2025-09-24

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39373] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12049/2025 Smt Nirmala Meena Wife Of Shri R.k. Meena, Aged About 66 Years, Resident Of A-1, Mother Teresa Nagar, Village Sawai Gator, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus Jaipur Development Authority, Through Secretary, Ram Kishore Vyas Bhawan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishwas Sharma Mr. Lokesh Jangid For Respondent(s) : Mr. Azad Ahmad HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 24/09/2025 The short controversy in the matter as submitted by the petitioner is that the petitioner is aggrieved of order dated 01.07.2025 (annexure-3) qua which it is submitted that for non- compliance of deposit of cost as awarded and the litigation pertaining to year 2015, his petition was dismissed without hearing the merits of the case. It is submitted by the counsel representing the petitioner that the matter is high on merits and he is also deposited the cost but with a slight delay. It is further submitted that a sympathetic approach be adopted, as merits should not be suppressed on account of procedural delays, moreover, due to fault of the counsel arguing the matter before the learned Trial Court. Heard. [2025:RJ-JP:39373] (2 of 2) [CW-12049/2025] Issue notice. On directions of the Court, notices are accepted by panel counsel for JDA Mr. Azad Ahmad. Learned counsel for the respondent- JDA has opposed the present petition. In the facts and circumstances, it is deemed appropriate that to meet the ends of justice, if the petitioner deposits a cost of Rs.10,000/- with respondent and Rs.5,000/- with Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority, petition will be revived. It is expected from the Tribunal that the same be considered, within a period of three months. In light of the above, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/52