Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 247/2015
ANIL BHATIA
.....Appellant Through: Mr. R. Krishnaamorthi and Mr. Jai Vardhan, Advs.
versus
N B C C LTD & ANR
.....Respondents Through: Ms. Ankita Bhadouria, Mr. Tushar Sannu and Mr. Pushkar Dwivedi, Advs. for R-1
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
O R D E R %
23.05.2025
1. The hearing is being conducted through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 29995/2025 (Exemption)
2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
3. The application stands disposed of.
REVIEW PET. 308/2025 (FOR REVIEW OF ORDER DT. 24.04.2025)
4. This application has been moved on behalf of the applicant/appellant seeking review of the order dated 24.04.2025.
5.
Learned counsel for the respondents is present on advance notice.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, this Court finds that there is no error apparent on the face of the record. The same arguments are being reiterated by the learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, which were addressed earlier. The plea that the right of the appellant to claim his outstanding dues is a This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/05/2025 at 11:24:34
continuing right is not sustainable.
7. The cited case in the present application, i.e. Samruddhi Co- operative Housing Society v. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. [2022 SCC OnLine SC 35] is clearly distinguishable and not applicable to the facts of the present matter.
8. The present review petition is dismissed.
DHARMESH SHARMA, J. MAY 23, 2025/sp/sa
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/05/2025 at 11:24:34