Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4188 (KAR)

SHRI SHANKAR DATTA NAIK v. THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS

RSA/5015/2008 · 2025-09-04

G Basavaraja

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.5015 OF 2008 (INJ) BETWEEN: SHRI SHANKAR DATTA NAIK, AGE:49 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O PALDA VILLAGE, POST:TINNEGHAT, TQ:JOIDA. ...APPELLANT [BY SRI.PRAKASH B.ANGADI, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND: 1. THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, HALIYAL DIVISION, HALIYAL, TQ:HALIYAL, DIST:UTTAR KANNAD. 2. THE ASSISTANT CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ALNAVAR SUB DIVISION, GANESHGUDI, POST:GANESHGUDI, TQ:JOIDA. 3. THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER, TINEGHAT, TQ:JOIDA. 4. THE SECTION FORESTER, KARAMBAL, POST.ANMOD, TQ.JOIDA. 5. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, UTTAR KANNAD, KARWAR. … RESPONDENTS (R1 AND R5 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) 2 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.05.2008 PASSED BY THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.), YALLAPUR IN R.A.NO.35/2007 AND THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.03.2007 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.), DANDELI IN O.S.NO.48/2004. THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of appellant. A Warning List was web-hosted on 15.10.2022 followed by Until Disposal List. The Until Disposal List was web-hosted on 29.10.2022 fixing the date of hearing from 02.11.2022. The captioned appeal is listed in until disposal list commencing from 02.11.2022. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2008. Now we are in the month of November 2022. The appeal is pending for almost fourteen years. 3 The matter was called out from 02.11.2022. There was no representation on behalf of appellant. As already noted above, though the matter called twice today also, there is no representation on behalf of appellant. Despite giving several opportunities, there is no representation on behalf of appellant. Hence, this Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE TKN