Awadhesh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors
CWJC/5009/2015 · 2025-07-08
Rajiv Roy
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41879 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41879 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5009 of 2015 ====================================================== Awadhesh Kumar Yadav Son of Sri Suresh Prasad Resident of Rikabganj, Katra Bazar, Patna City, P.S.- Malsalami, Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Director Ajay Kumar , Ghosh, Animal Husbandry Department
3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Patna City.
4. The Inspector in Charge Police Station Malsalmi, Patna City.3
5. Rama Shankar Prasad, Son of Not known Resident of Patna City. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mr. Vivek Prasad, GP18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 08-07-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though State is present.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):
“(a) To pass the implementation on the application filed by the petitioner to check the grabbing of Gowshala Land which is being grabbed under the conspiracy of the Gowshala Committee Members with the collusion of the S.D.O., Patna City for which various Protest application has been submitted but no action has been taken by the authorities by which open
Patna High Court CWJC No.5009 of 2015(3) dt.08-07-2025 2/2 space has been provided to grab the entire Gowshala Land under their malafide intentions. (b) To quash the tender passed by the S.D.O., Patna City (Respondent No. 3) and the entire proceeding of the tendering, the construction by which the land has gone in the pocket of the Land Mafia.”
3. Learned State counsel submits that the petition is virtually a Public Interest Litigation bereft of any document and as such, the same be dismissed with cost.
4. There is force in the submission of learned State counsel.
5. However, since there is no appearance, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-proseuction.
vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U