DEVENDRA SINGH SON OF BHAIRURAM ADOPTED SON OF RAMDEV v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SOSA/2112/2025 · 2025-10-17
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41876 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41876 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.2112/2025 in S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 2777/2025
1. Devendra Singh Son Of Bhairuram Adopted Son Of Ramdev, Resident Of Laxman Ka Bas, Tan Daulatpura, Police Station Dadia, District Sikar (Presently Residing At Ward No. 56, Opposite Petrol Pump, Ramawat Nagar, Nawalgarh Road, Sikar)
2. Kamla Wife Of Devendra Singh, Resident Of Laxman Ka Bas, Tan Daulatpura, Police Station Dadia, District Sikar (Presently Residing At Ward No. 56, Opposite Petrol Pump, Ramawat Nagar, Nawalgarh Road, Sikar)
3. Viplav Son Of Devendra, Resident Of Laxman Ka Bas, Tan Daulatpura, Police Station Dadia, District Sikar (Presently Residing At Ward No. 56, Opposite Petrol Pump, Ramawat Nagar, Nawalgarh Road, Sikar) ----Appellants Versus The State of Rajasthan, through its Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr.Jaggu Ram Bijarnia For Respondent(s) : Mr.Amit Kumar Gupta, Dy.GA-cum-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 17/10/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326 read with Section 34 IPC. The maximum sentence awarded to the appellants is three years and the same has already been suspended by the trial Court. Counsel
(2 of 3) [SOSA-2112/2025] submits that the appellants were on bail during the course of the trial and the disposal of the instant appeal is bound to take time, therefore, the sentence awarded to the appellants by the Trial Court be suspended till disposal of the appeal. 2. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the suspension of sentence application. 3. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by the counsel for the appellants and looking to the fact that the maximum sentence awarded to the appellants is three years and the same has already been suspended by the trial Court and the appellants were on bail during the course of trial and looking to the fact that disposal of the appeal is likely to take time, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused-appellants. 5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed by the appellants under Section 430 BNSS, 2023 is allowed and the sentence awarded by the trial Court against the appellants (I) Devendra Singh S/o Bhairuram Adopted S/o Ramdev, (II) Kamla W/o Devendra Singh (III) Viplav S/o Devendra shall remain suspended till final disposal of the instant appeal and subject to the condition that the appellants shall deposit a fine amount as imposed by the trial Court and they shall be released on bail provided each of them executes a personal bond for the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Judge for their appearance in this
(3 of 3) [SOSA-2112/2025] Court on 18.11.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-
1. That they shall appear before the Trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided. 2.
That if the appellants change their place of residence, they will give in writing their changed address to the Trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court. 3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s) and/or mobile number, they will give in writing their changed address and/or mobile number to the Trial Court. 4. Appellants shall deposit the fine amount as imposed by the learned Trial Court. 5. In case, the appellants are found involved in committing and repeating the same offence again, the State/complainant would be at liberty to move application for cancellation of bail. 6. The learned Trial Court shall maintain the record of attendance of the accused-appellants in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case relating to the original case in which the accused-appellants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. Case file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. 7. In case the said accused-appellants do not appear before the trial Court and/or commits any default, the learned Trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of the bail. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /59