Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41874 (KAR)

M/S PON PURE CHEM (P) LTD v. DR.VASANTHI AMAR

CCC/739/2023 · 2025-09-04

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35010-DB CCC No. 739 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 739 OF 2023 BETWEEN: M/S PON PURE CHEM (P) LTD (FORMERLY PURE CHEMICALS AND SOLVENT (P) LTD, NO.32 H BLOCK 15TH MAIN ROAD, ANNA NAGAR CHENNAI - 600 040 REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI PONNUSWAMI S/O LATE SRI MUTHUSAMI AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI AJIT KALYAN, ADV., - ABSENT) AND: 1. DR.VASANTHI AMAR AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (HONBLE ARBITRATOR) BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT K.G. ROAD, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35010-DB CCC No. 739 of 2023 NEAR DISTRICT REGISTRAR OFFICE, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI SAMPANGI RAMA NAGARA BENGALURU -560 009. …ACCUSED 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY VIKAS SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. …PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHERE IN HE PRAYS THAT THE HONBLE COURT BE PLEASED TO PUNISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW FOR INTERFERING WITH ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE AND ALSO SHOWING DISOBEDIENCE TO THE ORDERS PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN WP NO.9327/2022 (LA-RES) DATED 3.11.2022 PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE- A BY THE ACCUSED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35010-DB CCC No. 739 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) There is no appearance for the complainant today. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the compliance affidavit has been filed and that the directions contained in paragraph 6 of the judgment had been duly complied with. 3. The submission is taken on record. 4. Accordingly, the Contempt of Courts Case is closed. SD/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE CR List No.: 3 Sl No.: 35