OM PRAKASH RAJPUT, S/O ROOP SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/16072/2025 · 2025-10-17
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41873 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41873 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42865] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16072/2025 Om Prakash Rajput, S/o Roop Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village And Post- Bahtana, Tehsil And District- Deeg, Rajasthan. Working As Teacher Gr. Iii Level-1 At Lala Manohar Lal Khandel- wal, Govt. Girls Sr. Sec. School, Near Post Office, Ward No. 18, Deeg, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government Secretariat Ra- jasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner.
3. The District Education Officer, Elementary (Headquarter), Deeg
4. The District Election Officer (Collector), Deeg
5. The Election Registration Officer (S.d.m.), Assembly, Dis- trict Deeg. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 17/10/2025
1.
Learned counsel for petitioner while referring order dated 01.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13194/2025 Kuldeep Singh Bansiwal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., Order dated 04.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13367/2025 (Bharat Singh Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and
order dated 23.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.
[2025:RJ-JP:42865] (2 of 2) [CW-16072/2025] 14524/2025 (Vinita Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and submits that the controversy raised herein is squarely covered by an order passed by a Co-ordinate bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12975/2025) and accordingly this writ petition be disposed of.
2. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for pe- titioner and on perusal of judgment in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) and followed in subsequently de- cided case, this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation within a period of 4 weeks from today.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a fresh representation to respondents within a period of four weeks raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation, in light of ratio laid down in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra). After passing the order, the respon- dents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the pe- titioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he will have a right to re-approach the Court with fresh petition.
4. Accordingly, this writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /76