Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4187 (UTT)

PRADEEP SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/481/2025 · 2025-03-21

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:2007 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 481 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Pramod Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. V.S. Pal, learned AGA for the State. 3. Present applicant–Pradeep Singh is in judicial custody since 11.02.2025 and seeking bail in relation to FIR/Case Crime No.042 of 2025, registered on the basis of FIR dated 10.02.2025 at Police Station Gadarpur, District Udham Singh Nagar, wherein the present applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 8/21 of the N.D.P.S Act. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated; the contraband article, which was shown to be recovered from the present applicant, is 83 gram smack, which is below the commercial quantity. He further submits that the applicant has no previous criminal history. 5. On the other side, Mr. V.S. Pal, learned AGA for the State, on written instruction(s), submits that the contraband article, which was shown to be recovered from the present applicant, is below the commercial quantity and the applicant has no previous criminal history. 6. After hearing the arguments, as advanced by learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the alleged contraband article is below the commercial quantity, 2025:UHC:2007 and, furthermore, the applicant has no previous criminal history, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the present bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant, namely, Pradeep Singh, be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 9. It is made clear that in case the applicant is found to be indulged in future in any such activity, the respondent - State shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail granted to him by this Court. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 21.03.2025 R.Bisht 2025:UHC:2007