APHC010063782017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1181 OF 2017 Between: 1. GADELA VIJAYA SEKHAR, VISAKHAPATNAM PS.,LIMITS.,, S/o Lakshmi Ganesh Rao, 30 yrs, R/o Plot No.61, D. No. 50-120-91, Aditri Aravind Buildings, Seethammadhara, Near Sal Baba Temple,Vishakapatnam, Vishakapat(am P.S. limits. ...Petitioner AND 1. GADELA PRIYA DARSHINI KAKINADA ANR REP PP, W/o Vijaya Sekhar, 28 yrs, House wife, R/o D. No. 3-18A-3/2, Ayodyanagar, Road No. 3, Kakinada, III Town P.S. Limits. 2. State, represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature, at Hyderabad For the State of Telangana and State of A.P ...Respondents Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the Order passed by the learned IV Addl. Magistrate Of First Class at Kakinada in Crl. M.P No. 1324/2017 in M. C No. 23 of 2016, dated 31-03-2017, in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 1908 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of order in Crl. M.P No. 1324 of 2017 in M. C No. 23 of 2016 on the file of IV Addl. Magistrate of First Class at Kakinada Dt.31-03-2017, in the interest of justice, pending dispoal of the above CrI.R.0 of 2016 and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: M V RAJA RAAM Counsel for the Respondents: BS KARTIK PRASAD ESR Counsel for the Respondents:PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the order in Crl.M.P.No.1324 of 2017, dated 31.03.2017. The said Crl.M.P., is filed seeking for interim maintenance of Rs.25,000/- per month and the Trial Court granted interim maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month to the petitioner therein. 2. Aggrieved by the said order, the respondent preferred this revision petition. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor placed copy of e-Courts status relating to M.C.No.23 of 2016 which shows the disposal of the said Maintenance Case as dismissed. 4. In view of the disposal of M.C.No.23 of 2016, the cause in the present Criminal Revision Case does not survive. 5. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as cause does not survive. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 30.10.2025 Dvs 68 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1181 OF 2017 Date: 30.10.2025 Dvs