1 2025:CGHC:44896 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10384 of 2025 1 - Pyare Lal Sahu S/o Deva Ram Sahu Aged About 45 Years Posted And Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Swami Atmanand Govt. Utkrisht Hindi Medium School Jhalmala, Balod, Block- Balod, Distt.- Balod (C.G.) 2 - Rajesh Kumar Bhendia S/o Amar Singh Bhendia Aged About 46 Years Posted And Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Swami Atmanand Middle School Chikhalakasa, Block- Dondi, Distt.- Balod (C.G.) 3 - Amit Kumar Thakur S/o Late Umend Singh Thakur Aged About 35 Years Posted And Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Swami Atmanand Govt. Utkrisht Hindi Medium School Jhalmala, Balod, Block- Balod, Distt.- Balod (C.G.) 4 - Rajeshwari Thakur D/o Rohidas Singh Thakur Aged About 49 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Govt. H.S. School Baghmara, Block- Balod, Distt.- Balod (C.G.) 5 - Jitendra Kumar Sori S/o Baiju Ram Sori Aged About 42 Years Posted And Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School B/matiya, Block- Balod, Distt.- Balod (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.09.03 19:53:59 +0530 2 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Joint Director Durg, Education Division Durg (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Balod, District Balod (C.G.) 6 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Balod, District Balod (C.G.) 7 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) 8 - Block Education Officer Block Balod, District Balod (C.G.) 9 - Block Education Officer Block Dondi, District Balod (C.G.) 10 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Balod, District Balod (C.G.) 11 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Dondi, District Balod (C.G.) 12 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Antagarh, District Kanker (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 03/09/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners are seeking direction towards the respondent/ authorities for grant of Kramonnati Vetanman on completion of 10 years of service in view of the order passed by Division Bench of this High Court in WA No. 261/2023 on 28.02.2024 3 and also as per circular dated 10.03.2017. issued by the State Government of C.G. 2. The claim of the petitioners are with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to award of Kramonnati Vetanman some circular has also been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No. 261 of 2023 has also consider the identical issue. Petitioners are also entitle for Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to the competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 dated 28/02/2024. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and the documents. 5. Against the order passed in WA No. 261 of 2023, the State preferred a review petition bearing REVP No. 147 of 2024, which was considered and rejected by a detailed order. There against the State filed an SLP before the Supreme Court bearing SLP (C) No. 58525 of 2024, which was dismissed by order dated 17.03.2025. 6. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioners, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No. 261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 4 months from the date of receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not 4 expressed any opinion on merits of this case, it is for the competent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 7. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok