Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:47727-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 147 of 2023 Rajendra Prasad Yadav S/o Shri Anand Ram Yadav Aged About 48 Years Occupation - Journalist In Naw Bharat Daily News Paper, Saraypali R/o Ward No. 13 Post Office Street Saraypali, Thana And Tahsil - Saraypali, District - Mahasamund (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Home Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)
2. Superintendent of Police Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund (C.G.)
3. Station House Officer Police Station - Saraypali, District - Mahasamund (C.G.)
4. Loknath Patel S/o Shri Basant Kumar Patel Yashoda Kunj Basti Saraypali, Thana And Tahsil - Saraypali, District - Mahasamund (C.G.)
...Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No. 4 : Ms. Palak Dwivedi, Advocate. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.09.19 10:32:12 +0530
2 Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru
, Judge
Order
on Board
Per
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
17.09.2025
1. Heard Mr. Sunil Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Malay Jain, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for respondents No. 1 to 3/State as well as Ms. Palak Dwivedi, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 4.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:
“It is, therefore, prayed that the instant petition may kindly be allowed and the FIR of Crime No. 25 of 2023 dated 10.01.2023 registered at Police Station – Saraypali, District Mahasamund against the petitioner may kindly be quashed, in the interest of justice.”
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition, as in the instant case the charge-sheet has already been filed before the learned trial Court, charges have been framed against the petitioner, and evidence has commenced. Accordingly, it is prayed that the present petition may be permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to law, if any further cause of action arises.
4. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent
3 No. 4 have no objection to the said prayer.
5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan