[2025:RJ-JP:6891] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 955/2025 Swati Panwar Daughter of Late Shri Ramdev Panwar, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of House No. 345/34 New And 432/16 Old Pal Bichla, New Ramdev Temple, Ajmer (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor 2. Kailash Panwar Son Of Late Shri Hanuman Prasad, Resident Of 345/34 New And 432/16 Old, Near Ramdev Temple, Opposite Dayal Bidi Ghar, Pal Bichla, Ajmer (Raj). 3. Usha Panwar Wife Of Shri Virendra Dhenwal (Daughter Of Shri Kailash Panwar), Resident Of 345/34 New And 432/16 Old, Near Ramdev Temple, Opposite Dayal Bidi Ghar, Pal Bichla, Ajmer (Raj). 4. Nauratmal Kachawaha Son Of Shri Bhanwar Lal Kachawaha, Resident Of 447, Arjunlal Sethi Colony, Adarsh Nagar, Ajmer (Raj). 5. Suraj Prakash Son Of Shri Balu Ram, Resident Of Suratkhana Mohalla, Ms 3258, Nasirabad, Tehsil Nasirabad, District Ajmer (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shyam Prakash Sharma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishiraj Singh Rathore, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 17/02/2025 Instant petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the complainant-petitioner against the order dt.10.12.2024 passed by the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, No.3, Ajmer, in Complaint No.16/2023, whereby the complaint filed by the complainant-petitioner was dismissed. Heard. Perused. [2025:RJ-JP:6891] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-955/2025] The impugned order dt. 10.12.2024 passed by the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, No.3, Ajmer is a revisable order. The present petition has been filed before this Court without prior approaching to the Court of Sessions. In view of above, learned counsel appearing for the complainant-petitioner, has prayed that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to the complainant-petitioner to approach before the Court of Sessions. Permission, as sought for is granted. The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. However, it is made clear that the period taken in present petition (from filing of petition to the date of this order) shall be excluded in computing the period of limitation for filing of petition before the Court of Sessions. Office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents annexed thereto to the learned counsel appearing for the complainant-petitioner, after retaining photostat copies thereof on record. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J ASHOK-shubham