Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41858 (KAR)

SRI. CHINNEGOWDA G M v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

WP/23903/2025 · 2025-08-23

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33197 WP No. 23903 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.23903 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. CHINNEGOWDA G M S/O. LATE. MELAGIRIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O. OLD ELLEN SCHOOL ROAD, WARD NO. 2, T.B EXTENSION, NAGAMANGALA TOWN AND TALUK – 571432 2. 3. 4. SRI. MASTHAIAH U MARIYAPPA, S/O. MARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/O. 230, NAGAMANGALA, NAGAMANGALA – 571432. SRI. KRISHNA S/O MASTHAIAH U MARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SRI. N.M. SHANKAR S/O MASTHAIAH U MARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, PETITIONERS NO.3 & 4 ARE BOTH R/O SANTHE BEEDI NELAMANGALA TOWN – 571432. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P MAHESHA., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33197 WP No. 23903 of 2025 AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER REVENUE SUB DIVISION, PANDAVAPURA, MANDYA DIST - 571434. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, NAGAMANGALA - 571432, MANDYA DISTRICT. 3. 4. 5. SMT. LEELAVATI, W/O. LATE GOVINDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. SRI. KALIKAMBA TEMPLE, OPP TO KST ROAD, NAGAMANGALA TOWN AND TALUK - 571434 MANDYA DISTRICT. SRI. ABHIJEET G S/O LATE GOVINDARAJU SRI. ASHWIN G S S/O LATE GOVINDARAJU RESPONDENTS NO.4 & 5 ARE R/O OLD POST OFFICE ROAD WARD NO.4, T B EXTENSION NELAMANGALA TOWN-571434. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH., HCGP FOR R1 & R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, PANDAVAPURA SUB DIVISION PANDAVAPURA IN CASE NO R. MISC. (NA)- 161/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE - LAND - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33197 WP No. 23903 of 2025 CONSEQUENTLY REJECT THE APPEAL FILED BY RESPONDENT NO. 3, SEEKING CANCELLATION OF RE- GRANT AND RESUMPTION OF LAND TO GOVERNMENT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking leave of this court to withdraw the petition on the ground that the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. The memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL