Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41858 (ALL)

DAULAT RAM AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/22792/2021 · 2025-10-12

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22792 of 2021 Court No. - 74 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants; learned A.G.A. for State and perused the record. 2. Present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the order dated 28.09.2021 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-3, Mathura in Criminal Revision No.65 of 2020 (concerned Complaint No.198 of 2016) (Daulat Ram and others Vs. State of U.P. and another) and order dated 08.01.2020 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Chhata, Mathura in Complaint No.198 of 2016 (Roop Chand Sharm Vs. Shyam Babu Sharma and others). 3. On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicants has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously. 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicants. 5. On perusal of impugned order, prima facie offence is made out against the applicants. Considering the argument of learned counsel for the applicants, the instant application is pending since 2019 and no interim order order was passed in favour of the applicants. It is evident that the applicants did not participate in the trial proceeding. 6. Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicants through this application is refused. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramesh Prasad Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Daulat Ram And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that applicants shall surrender before the concerned Court below within three weeks from today and in case apply for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922. 8. For the period of three weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them. 9. With the aforesaid directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands disposed of. October 13, 2025 Sanjeet A482 No. 22792 of 2021 2 (Deepak Verma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANJEET KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad