IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19385 of 2016 ====================================================== Shambhu Prasad Yadav Son of Late Raghunath Prasad Yadav Resident of Village-Kauriar tola Lakshmipur, P.S.-Razaul, District-East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Collector, East Champaran Motihari 3. The District Land Acquisition Officer, East Champaran, Motihari ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 08-09-2025 The parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “(i) for issuance of an appropriate writ/order direction to direct the respondents to make payment the rest compensation amount to the petitioner according to land Acquisition Act, 2013 with regard to land of the petitioner which has been acquired. (ii) for issuance of an appropriate writ/order direction to the respondents to make rest-payment the compensation amount to the petitioner with regard to his land at the new rate considering away letter no. 14/D.L.A.-L A (India Government) of/2014-283/RA Patna-15 dated Patna High Court CWJC No.19385 of 2016(3) dt.08-09-2025 2/2 26.02.2014 as contained in Annexure-2 to this petition. (iii) for issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction to the respondents to make payment the compensation amount with regard to the land of the petitioner considering away the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court which has been passed in Civil Appeal No. 877 of 2014 dated 24.01.2014 being Pune Municipal Corporation vs. Harkchand Mishrimal Solanki and others. (iv) for issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction to the respondent for which the petitioner is entitled.” 3. Mr. Suresh Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U