Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41849 (CHH)

AWADH RAM DHRUV v. SMT. URMILA KANWAR

WP227/862/2025 · 2025-08-31

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:44226 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 862 of 2025 1 - Awadh Ram Dhruv S/o Lakhan Lal Dhruv Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Khamharmuda, Post Kamroud, Tahsil Baghbahra, District Mahasamund C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Smt. Urmila Kanwar W/o Bhav Singh Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Bhaisamuda, Post- Dulla, Tahsil Chhura, District Gariyaband C.G. 2 - Smt. Sushila W/o Vijay Diwan Aged About 51 Years R/o Village Barula,tahsil And District Gariyaband C.G. 3 - Smt. Desu W/o Pritam Singh Diwan Aged About 68 Years R/o Village Ganjar, Tahsil Baghbahra, Dist- Mahasamund C.G. 4 - Smt. Nootan W/o Bhuvneshwar R/o Village Kaunsara, Tahsil Baghbahra, Dist- Mahasamund C.G. 5 - Smt. Purnima W/o Unknown Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Dharambandha, Tahsil And District Nurapada (Orissa) 6 - Ku. Kiran D/o Roop Singh Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Dharambandha, Tahsil And District Nurapada (Orissa) 7 - Mahesh Diwan S/o Dukhuram Diwan Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Kusmi, Tahsil Chhura, District Gariyaband C.G. 8 - Kenwra Bai Wd/o Ganesh Diwan Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Kusmi, Tahsil Chhura, District Gariyaband C.G. 9 - Smt. Durgesh Nandini Dhruv D/o Narendra Kumar Dhruv R/o Village Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.09.01 18:03:12 +0530 2 Thakurpara, Koliyari, Tuha, Tahsil Bhakhara, District Dhamtari C.G. 10 - Smt. Anita Dhruv W/o Jitendra Kumar Dhruv R/o Village C.G. Civic Center Qr. No. D/9/10, S.C.P.L. Town-C, Ruwabandha, Bhilai, District Durg C.G. 11 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector District Mahasamund C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Gurudev I. Sharan, Advocate For State : Ms. Neelima Singh Thakur, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order On Board 01-09-2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of reserving liberty in favor of petitioner to submit the revenue documents in the file of pending civil suit. 2) No objection from other side. 3) Permission granted. 4) Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya