DILIP GANDHI SON OF LATE MEERCHAND JI GANDHI v. DEVANAND SHARMA SON OF SHRI RAJU SHARMA
CW/19535/2018 · 2025-01-02
Avneesh Jhingan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41834 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41834 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:205] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19535/2018 Dilip Gandhi Son Of Late Meerchand Ji Gandhi, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of B-26, Basant Vihar Colony, Gopalpura Bypass Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus Devanand Sharma Son Of Shri Raju Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of House No. 96, Keshav Vihar, Gopalpura Bypass, Jaipur ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 22750/2018 Devanand Sharma, S/o Shri Raju Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, R/o House No 96, Keshav Vihar, Gopalpura Bye Pass, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus Dilip Gandhi S/o Late Meerchand Ji Gandhi, Aged About 59 Years, R/o B-26, Basant Vihar Colony, Gopalpura Byepass, Jaipur ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dhananjay Sharma for Mr. Hemant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Muskan Verma for Mr. Rajeev Surana, Sr. Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Order 02/01/2025
1. These two petitions were filed raising a grievance against an interim order passed during the pendency of the eviction suit.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner in SBCWP No.19535/2018 submits that during the pendency of the petition, the suit for eviction has been decided.
[2025:RJ-JP:205] (2 of 2) [CW-19535/2018]
3.
Learned counsel for the respondent is not in a position to dispute the contention.
3. In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous.
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J RIYA/68-69