APHC010572812025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29931/2025 Between: 1. S PARVEEN TAJ, W/O SHAIK KHADER BASHA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.22-29, SULTANSAHAB STREET, PUNGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PUNGANUR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR and Dr. P.B Reddy Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring inaction of the 2ND and 3RD respondents not considering the petitioner representation dated 15.08.2024 and 16.09.2024 not take any action against the named accused in the complaint as being as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India, and consequently praying his Hon'ble Court to direct the 3RD respondent to take necessary action against the real culprits in accordance with law and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in circumstances of the case.” 2 2. Heard Sri P.V.Venkata Ravi Sankar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that they have not received any representation from the petitioner dated 15.08.2024 and 16.09.2024. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of by permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is permitted to make a fresh representation to the police. On receiving such representation, the police are directed to look into the contents of the representation and act in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:04.11.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.29931 of 2025 Dt.04.11.2025 Asr