Medikurthi Mallikarjuna, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/29853/2025 · 2025-11-17
K Sreenivasa Reddy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41833 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41833 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010580632025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: Between:
1. MEDIKURTHI MALLIKARJUNA,, S/O.M.CHINNABAYANNA , AGED 45 YEARS, R/O.2-6, CHINNAGANDLAPALLI, DODDIPALLE, FILER MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDING AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. PROJECT OFFICER/CHAIRMAN, ITDA, INTEGRATED TR DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, APTWR SCHOOL(B) CHENNUR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus o declaring he action of the Respondents in rejecting the Petitioners tender/bid on the ground of alleged blacklisting as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1 )(g) of the Constitution IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 29853/2025 MEDIKURTHI MALLIKARJUNA,, S/O.M.CHINNABAYANNA , AGED 45 6, CHINNAGANDLAPALLI, DODDIPALLE, FILER MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDING AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SPSR NELLORE PROJECT OFFICER/CHAIRMAN, ITDA, INTEGRATED TR DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
THE PRINCIPAL, APTWR SCHOOL(B) CHENNUR, ANNAMAYYA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, declaring he action of the Respondents in rejecting the Petitioners tender/bid on the ground of alleged blacklisting as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1 )(g) of the Constitution of India and Consequently Direct IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3327] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY MEDIKURTHI MALLIKARJUNA,, S/O.M.CHINNABAYANNA , AGED 45 6, CHINNAGANDLAPALLI, DODDIPALLE, FILER ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SPSR NELLORE PROJECT OFFICER/CHAIRMAN, ITDA, INTEGRATED TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. THE PRINCIPAL, APTWR SCHOOL(B) CHENNUR, ANNAMAYYA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature r any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, declaring he action of the Respondents in rejecting the Petitioners tender/bid on the ground of alleged blacklisting as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of of India and Consequently Direct
2
the Respondents to consider and process the Petitioners bid submitted pursuant to the re-tender notification dated 22.10.2025 for the supply of eggs and boiler chicken for the academic year 2025-26, in accordance with law and Pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VALLEPU REDDY NIKHIL GANESH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
3
The Court made the following order:
Sri V.Reddy Nikhil Ganesh, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in the Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Date: 18.11.2025
MP
4
111 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.29853 OF 2025
Date: 18.11.2025
MP